Teams

WI Puibello 18&Over4.0M

2024 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Mark Rosenberg vs Rick Vetter / Vaughan Joubert6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMatthew Noack vs Nathan Locicero6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCraig Fluegge vs Jeffrey Josse6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChris Urban / Eric Lederman vs Ashish Nigote / Maurice Russell5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Michael Stanaszak vs Vaughan Joubert / Rick Vetter6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Urban / Mark Rosenberg vs Bob Liebman / Jeffrey Katzban6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Fluegge / Eric Lederman vs Maurice Russell / Ashish Nigote7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichael Stanaszak / Alex Yang vs Shane Jones / Chase Garber6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMatthew Noack vs Joe Remschak6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Steven Buccellato vs Brian Brickler / Brant Christensen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNick Puibello / Craig Fluegge vs Justin Kirkpatrick / Matt Hammernik4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-16vs WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML WAC RathmellSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Stanaszak / Matthew Noack vs J Vanderheyden / Matthew Miller6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Steven Buccellato vs Trigg Knerr / Nathaniel Marshall4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKirk Woosencraft vs Ameeth Bharadwaj5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEric Lederman / Nick Puibello vs Keith Rathmell / Jonathan Wipplinger3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Michael Stanaszak vs Brian Brickler / Shane Jones3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNick Puibello / Craig Fluegge vs Chase Garber / Brant Christensen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Urban / Mark Rosenberg vs Justin Kirkpatrick / Matt Haeger7-6, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCraig Fluegge / Michael Stanaszak vs Brian Brickler / Brant Christensen6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Buccellato / Nick Puibello vs Matt Hammernik / Matt Haeger6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Michael Stanaszak vs Mike Bell / Tom Holtzen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Noack vs Keith Tubin6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNick Puibello / Mark Rosenberg vs Tim Peterson / Eric Olson6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKirk Woosencraft vs Ken Crocker6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Urban / Eric Lederman vs Brian Kronberg / Adam Swanson6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMichael Stanaszak / Chris Urban vs Bob Liebman / Rick Vetter6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Craig Fluegge vs Robert Fredrickson / Ashish Nigote6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNick Puibello / Mark Rosenberg vs Maurice Russell / Jeffrey Katzban3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichael Stanaszak / Brian Ellenbecker vs Shea O'Rorke / Scott Vander Heiden6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLuke Paulson / Nick Puibello vs Trigg Knerr / Nathaniel Marshall4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKirk Woosencraft / Craig Fluegge vs Joshua Travis / Darryl Schmidt7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCraig Fluegge / Michael Stanaszak vs Ethan Taxman / David Winston7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Steven Buccellato vs Michael Griggs / Juan Munoz6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Rosenberg / Chris Urban vs John Emory / Luke LaManna7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Matthew Noack
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Kirk Woosencraft
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Michael Stanaszak
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.80
Craig Fluegge
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brian Ellenbecker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Chris Urban
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.61
Luke Paulson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Lederman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Puibello
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Steven Buccellato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Turner Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Buccellato + Brian Ellenbecker3255% gamesnot enough data
Brian Ellenbecker + Michael Stanaszak314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Stanaszak + Nick Puibello224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Urban + Eric Lederman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Noack
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Kirk Woosencraft
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Michael Stanaszak
27W–16L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Craig Fluegge
22W–14L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Brian Ellenbecker
15W–18L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris Urban
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Luke Paulson
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
Eric Lederman
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nick Puibello
7W–8L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Buccellato
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Turner Swanson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.