Teams

Spicer - Feelin' Single

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 8 9:00 PM
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
Sep 12 2:00 PM
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs Du - JuanWon 21
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Chengyin Wu6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Julie Duffy2-6, 4-2
W#3 SinglesTina Halley vs Sueyun Hsieh6-0, 7-5
2026-08-22vs Du - JuanLost 12
L#1 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Julie Duffy1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesEvelien Josselin vs Sueyun Hsieh4-1
L#3 SinglesYunden Jinsmaa vs Xuan Du5-7, 1-4
2026-08-15vs Du - JuanLost 12
W#1 SinglesJoy Oliver vs Chao Wang7-5, 2-1
L#2 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Chengyin Wu2-6, 2-5
L#3 SinglesYunden Jinsmaa vs ZIJING YE0-6, 4-6
2026-08-10vs Du - JuanLost 12
L#1 SinglesKerry Spicer vs Chao Wang1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJoy Oliver vs Wenxi Li6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesYunden Jinsmaa vs Xuan Du5-7, 4-5
2026-08-01vs Du - JuanLost 12
W#1 SinglesJoy Oliver vs Chengyin Wu6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKerry Spicer vs Chao Wang1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesYunden Jinsmaa vs Xuan Du2-6, 4-6
2026-07-29vs Du - JuanLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs ZIJING YE5-7, 4-3
L#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Wenxi Li5-7, 3-2
L#3 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Jocelyn Lin7-5, 1-4
2026-07-22vs Du - JuanWon 21
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs ZIJING YE6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJoy Oliver vs Wenxi Li6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKerry Spicer vs Jocelyn Lin3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spicer - Feelin' Single134813102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Evelien Josselin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.82
Joy Oliver
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Yunden Jinsmaa
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Kerry Spicer
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.31
Irena Bucci
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Evelien Josselin
202W–69L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
4.13
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
Yunden Jinsmaa
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Kerry Spicer
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Irena Bucci
97W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.