Teams

Terminetters

Summer Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY Doubles · 2.5 Ladies

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-28vs Summer NinjasSplit 11
L#2 DoublesXiomara Gonzalez / Jennifer Wren vs Jennifer Antill / Amber Sue Huff6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJan Achilles / Alexandra Plichta vs Kellie Wilson / Kari Obrien6-3, 6-0
2026-08-18vs ATX AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Azari / Sheila Cooper vs Nedra Gartica / Jennifer Leisure0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesXiomara Gonzalez / Lana Bernberg vs Abby Johnston / Melissa Francis6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsey Schoenfeld / Maryann Parris vs Kathy Panton / Susannah Ramshaw3-6, 5-7
2026-08-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Azari / Lindsey Schoenfeld vs Kari Obrien / Kellie Wilson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-31vs ATX AcesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Plichta / Xiomara Gonzalez vs Rachel Pry / Melissa Francis6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaryann Parris / Lindsey Schoenfeld vs Susannah Ramshaw / Abby Johnston2-6, 3-6
2026-07-17vs Summer NinjasSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wren / Rebecca Azari vs Jennifer Antill / Debi Prickette3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Plichta / Catherine DeStasio vs Kari Obrien / Kellie Wilson6-4, 6-3
2026-07-10vs ATX AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Jo Specter / Maryann Parris vs Rachel Pry / Kathy Panton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Plichta / Sheila Cooper vs Nedra Gartica / Joanne Blackerby6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Summer Ninjas3072670
2Terminetters236922157
3ATX Aces135714112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Jan Achilles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Melissa Lapietra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Lindsey Schoenfeld
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Rebecca Azari
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Alexandra Plichta
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Maryann Parris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.87
Xiomara Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Lapietra + Lindsey Schoenfeld213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Schoenfeld + Maryann Parris033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jan Achilles
49W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Melissa Lapietra
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Lindsey Schoenfeld
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Rebecca Azari
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Alexandra Plichta
4W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Maryann Parris
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Xiomara Gonzalez
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.