Teams

Williams Y - Townsend

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-26vs Deerwood - BirdsongWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristie Morse / Ann Garab vs Lisa Aboudan / Sheri Goldstein4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Roberts / Lindsay Somers vs Karen Turnbach / Holly Delaney6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNANCY MBUTHIA / Natalia Mendoza vs Cary Young / Robyn Sieron6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesAnne Marie Cushmac / Tanya Ashe vs Patricia Sogueco / Zee Cakmis6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Christie Morse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
2.95
Natalia Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Anne Marie Cushmac
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Lisa Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Carey Bass
published 3
2.78
Simona Gavaller
published
2.77
Christi Allen
published 3
2.75
Lindsay Somers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Ann Garab
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Mary Townsend
published
2.74
Chelsea Mailhiot
published 3
2.71
Tanya Ashe
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Beth Stambaugh
published 3
2.57
Sheila Caballero
published
Heather Parrish
published
Holly Fields
published
NANCY MBUTHIA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Kissell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Garab + Christie Morse2351% games+2.7% vs expected
Natalia Mendoza + Sheila Caballero134 matchesnot enough data
Carey Bass + Mary Townsend123 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Ashe + Chelsea Mailhiot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christie Morse
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Christina Biggers
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Natalia Mendoza
19W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Anne Marie Cushmac
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Lisa Roberts
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Carey Bass
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Simona Gavaller
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
3
Christi Allen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lindsay Somers
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Ann Garab
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Mary Townsend
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chelsea Mailhiot
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Tanya Ashe
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%7%93%
2.71
3
Beth Stambaugh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Sheila Caballero
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Heather Parrish
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Holly Fields
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
NANCY MBUTHIA
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Kissell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.