Teams

CRRC-Ounaphom

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Doug Matheson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Steve Swan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Trina Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Yan Morrissey
published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.77
Karin Owens
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Elena Kochetkova
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-03-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKarin Owens / Doug Matheson vs Joanna Asia Wagner / Aj Messer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElena Kochetkova / Steve Swan vs Rachel Ritchie / Blake Simonsen6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTrina Newcomb / Robert Glenn vs Nobue Kaite / Seth Wagner6-4, 6-0
2024-02-25Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Swan / Karin Owens vs Bill Henderson / Thu Johnson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDoug Matheson / Valerie Neill vs Christopher Graham / Jian Xu3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Megan McCarter vs Chresten Gram / Barbara Gram6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-09Won 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Owens / Trina Newcomb vs Rhonda Baker / Mike Baker6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMegan McCarter / Robert Glenn vs Susan Judge / Gilbert Chiang6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Swan / Crystal Ounaphom vs Teresa Metke / Jeffrey Metke7-6, 6-4
2024-02-04Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDoug Matheson / Valerie Neill vs John Yu / Heike Droste6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan McCarter / Ryan Owens vs Zack Hegge / Maryam Farinola1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Karin Owens vs David Hoiland / Anna Boyarshinova6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesMegan McCarter / Ryan Owens vs Monica Christensen / Kerry Sweet6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Swan / Elena Kochetkova vs Elicia Putnam / Roger Dehoog6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Matheson / Crystal Ounaphom vs Rhonda Baker / Mike Baker6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-28Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Valerie Neill vs Natalya Ramras / Greg Mikol6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Swan / Karin Owens vs Matt Savage / Heather Watkins6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMegan McCarter / Ryan Owens vs Joe Trachta / Anne Hamburg6-2, 6-3
2024-01-20Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Swan / Valerie Neill vs Jocelyn Smith / Michael Won6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDoug Matheson / Elena Kochetkova vs Karen Pickering / Mark Bernazzani6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Trina Newcomb vs Heather Watkins / Matt Savage6-1, 7-6
2024-01-07Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDoug Matheson / Karin Owens vs WonKyu Kim / Ellen Hodges6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteve Swan / Crystal Ounaphom vs Jill Boyce / Rajan Madhusudan6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Elena Kochetkova vs Janet Ha / Paritosh Saxena7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Doug Matheson
20W–40L career
not enough data
3.5
Steve Swan
28W–51L career
0%42%58%
3.65
3.5
Trina Newcomb
79W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Yan Morrissey
54W–73L career
5%95%0%
3.15
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Karin Owens
82W–66L career
1%99%0%
2.77
3
Elena Kochetkova
31W–45L career
2%98%1%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.