Teams

WNC M Padgett (ARCS)

Tri-Level 55 & Over NC WNC 2022 · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-11vs WNC R McMahan (BM)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Melanie Wiener vs Debbie Wanser / Lisa Smith6-0, 6-2
2022-08-04vs WNC B Weinland (HRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Jodi Shainberg vs Claudia Gavin / Jane Miller6-2, 6-0
2022-07-28vs WNC P Harris (CS)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Marie Cowan vs Pamela Harris / Carolyn Marzendorfer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-23vs WNC P Harris (CS)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathryn Drake / Sallie LaChance vs Pamela Harris / Mary Jo Sparrow6-3, 6-2
2022-06-16vs WNC B Bowie (HRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarie Cowan / Sallie LaChance vs Brenda Bowie / Sharlyn Aamodt6-4, 6-1
2022-06-09vs WNC E Brown (ARC-DT)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Eleanor Thompson vs Susan Black / Terry Davis6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Margaret Deutsch
published
Deborah James
published 4
3.60
Jodi Shainberg
published
3.60
Sallie LaChance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Melanie Wiener
published
3.34
Scott Abernethy
published
3.27
3.26
MARY PADGETT
published
Diana Pavlick
published 3.5
3.22
Marie Cowan
published
3.00
Kathryn Drake
published
2.90
Debbie Berry
published 3
Holly Roe
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Deutsch
97W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Deborah James
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Shainberg
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sallie LaChance
140W–131L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
Melanie Wiener
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Scott Abernethy
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Meridith Elliott Powell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
MARY PADGETT
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Diana Pavlick
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marie Cowan
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Kathryn Drake
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Debbie Berry
27W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Holly Roe
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.