Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJessica Fierro vs Roshelly Paliza2-6, 2-6
2025-04-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica Fierro / Lourdes Livingston vs Monica Medina / ALEJANDRA MONROY7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica Fierro / Lourdes Livingston vs Georgina Munoz / Maya I Quevedo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Cecilia Trejo
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.82
Ada Castro
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
Dolly Ricks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Fernanda Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Gloria King
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Jessica Fierro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kerry Lore
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Lauren Berdeja
usually #1 Singles 59%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Lorena Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Lourdes Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mariel Berdeja
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Monica Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Natalia Castaneda
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Renee Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Sintra Sampath
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Lore + Sintra Sampath13557% gamesnot enough data
Monica Gonzalez + Renee Aguilar10363% gamesnot enough data
Ada Castro + Dolly Ricks4645% gamesnot enough data
Kerry Lore + Patricia Dalbin6366% gamesnot enough data
Dolly Ricks + Gloria King5350% gamesnot enough data
Ada Castro + Cecilia Trejo4351% gamesnot enough data
Linda Rowse + Sintra Sampath7069% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Trejo + Dolly Ricks4250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecilia Trejo
34W–28L career · 21 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Ada Castro
35W–36L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Dolly Ricks
60W–73L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fernanda Rodriguez
6W–2L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 62 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Fierro
12W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Lore
83W–74L career · 42 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Berdeja
20W–12L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorena Reynolds
78W–105L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lourdes Livingston
45W–70L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariel Berdeja
21W–19L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Gonzalez
55W–41L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalia Castaneda
39W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Aguilar
36W–19L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sintra Sampath
74W–34L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.