Teams

RSchuler (Queens)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs MSutherland/Helms (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNadine Neel / Rachael Schuler vs Anna Kamenova / Becky Tennyson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Parker / Caroline Pickup vs Cheri King / Lina Clarke6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeather Crysler / Kristen Oliver vs Emily Weigel / Meaghan Richardson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-01vs KMcGregor/KHart (Blakeney)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Nadine Neel vs Christina Peterson / India Branker6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristen Oliver / Jennifer Sopel vs Donna DePollo / Lee Page6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Cynthia Frasier vs Carrie Childs / Michelle Wright6-1, 6-1
2025-09-24vs HShaw (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Natwick / Debbie Miller vs Lisa Kane / Carolyn Drake4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Nadine Neel vs Jennifer Gardiner / Kristin Davin2-6, 1-6
2025-09-17vs SReynolds (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sopel / Rachael Schuler vs Colleen Hickman / Amy Schroeder4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesIrma Laney / Heather Crysler vs Kerri Good / Nicole Morris6-0, 6-1
2025-09-03vs MSutherland/Helms (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Vizzini / Anna Hitchins vs Lina Clarke / Cheri King7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNadine Neel / Caroline Pickup vs Meaghan Richardson / Emily Weigel6-3, 6-1
2025-08-27vs KMcGregor/KHart (Blakeney)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Cynthia Frasier vs Donna DePollo / Christina Peterson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Oliver / Jennifer Sopel vs Carrie Childs / Smita Thakur7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Crysler / Irma Laney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-20vs HShaw (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Nadine Neel vs Janet Steyl / Nan Miller6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Natwick / Debbie Miller vs Kristin Davin / Jennifer Gardiner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana West / Heather Crysler vs Carolyn Drake / Virginia Jenkins2-6, 5-7
2025-08-13vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Jennifer Sopel vs Nicole Morris / Colleen Hickman6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Irma Laney vs Marta Tataje / Elizabeth Strack7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.27
Debbie Miller
published 4.5
Anna Hitchins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Cynthia Frasier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Jennifer Sopel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Claudia Vizzini
published 4.5
4.13
Nadine Neel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.08
Caroline Pickup
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 4
4.01
Irma Laney
published
3.79
Kristen Oliver
published
3.77
Rachael Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Holly Natwick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Heather Crysler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Crysler + Kristen Oliver4258% games+2.5% vs expected
Holly Natwick + Rachael Schuler9259% gamesnot enough data
Nadine Neel + Caroline Pickup8266% gamesnot enough data
Holly Natwick + Heather Crysler4256% gamesnot enough data
Anna Hitchins + Holly Natwick4166% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Sopel + Nadine Neel314 matchesnot enough data
Holly Natwick + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Sopel + Rachael Schuler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diana West
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Debbie Miller
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Anna Hitchins
96W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cynthia Frasier
46W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jennifer Sopel
76W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Claudia Vizzini
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Nadine Neel
162W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Caroline Pickup
245W–112L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.08
Irma Laney
28W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Kristen Oliver
29W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Rachael Schuler
295W–156L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Holly Natwick
85W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Heather Crysler
155W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.