Teams

Echols/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-16vs Carter/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Gallops / Latasha Echols vs Mary Johnston Tayloe / Ashley Wallace6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Richards / Bianca Clayton vs Leslie Wilkinson / Haden Kane0-6, 1-6
2025-09-14vs Silver/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNelli Golmeeva / Betsy Ferguson vs Lisa Silver / Silvia Hecht7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLatasha Echols / Jenna Cutshall vs Margo Gruen / Jenny Branston2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Emily Gallops
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Bianca Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Caitlin Bond
published 4
3.68
Betsy Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Hanh Vaught
published
3.62
Andrea Henry
published 4
3.59
Jenna Cutshall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Nelli Golmeeva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Gloria Hicks
published
3.40
Latasha Echols
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Sandra Richards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Latasha Echols + Gloria Hicks4447% games+5.9% vs expected
Andrea Henry + Latasha Echols7253% games+2.3% vs expected
Betsy Ferguson + Nelli Golmeeva224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Henry + Gloria Hicks123 matchesnot enough data
Hanh Vaught + Latasha Echols033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Gallops
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
4.06
4
Bianca Clayton
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Caitlin Bond
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Betsy Ferguson
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Hanh Vaught
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Andrea Henry
32W–32L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Jenna Cutshall
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Nelli Golmeeva
22W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Gloria Hicks
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Latasha Echols
31W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Sandra Richards
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.