Teams

Fassnacht - Racket Rebels

2025 Fredericksburg Singles · Fredericksburg Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-14vs Fawn Lake CatulloLost 12
L#1 SinglesSabra Szczyglowski vs Erika Subkanha0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Cramer vs Karen Franklin3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesBeth Sanford vs Emily Ochsenknecht3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Fawn Lake CatulloLost 12
L#1 SinglesSabra Szczyglowski vs Erika Subkanha5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTara Ford vs Emily Ochsenknecht7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBeth Sanford vs Jennifer Isham4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Fawn Lake CatulloWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmanda Jamero vs Erika Subkanha6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTara Ford vs Karen Franklin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBeth Sanford vs Laurel Thoreson6-2, 6-2
2025-09-20vs Fawn Lake CatulloWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmanda Jamero vs Erika Subkanha7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTara Ford vs Karen Franklin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHannah Cramer vs Robin Long2-6, 2-6
2025-09-06vs Fawn Lake CatulloLost 12
L#1 SinglesNicole Fassnacht vs Erika Subkanha0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Sanford vs Emily Ochsenknecht1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKatie DeWald vs Jennifer Isham6-2, 6-0
2025-08-30vs Fawn Lake CatulloWon 20
W#1 SinglesNicole Fassnacht vs Emily Ochsenknecht5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTara Ford vs Robin Long6-2, 6-1
2025-08-23vs Fawn Lake CatulloLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmanda Jamero vs Erika Subkanha7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTara Ford vs Linda Catullo6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesKatie DeWald vs Jennifer Isham6-7, 3-6
2025-08-20vs Fawn Lake CatulloWon 21
W#1 SinglesSabra Szczyglowski vs Karen Franklin6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHannah Cramer vs Linda Catullo1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesMary Blake vs Laurel Thoreson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Amanda Jamero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Hannah Cramer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Katie DeWald
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Tara Ford
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Beth Sanford
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Mary Blake
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Nicole Fassnacht
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Jamero
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Hannah Cramer
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Katie DeWald
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Beth Sanford
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Mary Blake
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Fassnacht
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.