Teams

MCP.Selbo

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-07vs TOC.SalianWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Greg Selbo vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash / Ashok Babu Raparla3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-28vs PW.MesserWon 10
W#1 SinglesVidit Desai vs Brent Eichenseer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-14vs TING.TandonLost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Hofberg vs Alay Patel6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesVidit Desai vs John Doe6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlex Bryan / Patrick Polhemus vs Vijay Rajasekar / Santosh Voruganti0-6, 4-6
2024-04-07vs TOC.ByrneWon 20
W#2 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Tyler DeZubay vs Jason Jin / Charlie Foster6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVidit Desai vs NEALE STUTT6-2, 6-3
2024-03-10vs PW.MesserLost 12
L#1 DoublesTyler DeZubay / David Hofberg vs Ryan Kessler / Terry Messer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVidit Desai / Scott Daniel vs Blake Hall / Frank Schneider3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlex Bryan / Patrick Polhemus vs Ariel Edery / Todd Takalo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs TOC.SalianLost 03
L#1 DoublesVidit Desai / David Mize vs Mahesh Salian / Sam Kasarla2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDavid Hofberg vs Vivek Singh2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Polhemus / Jeff Rauber vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash / Ashok Babu Raparla3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-25vs TING.TandonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Vidit Desai vs Nagarajan Janagar / Alay Patel7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-02-18vs TOC.ByrneLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatrick Polhemus / Krishna Bhat vs Anthony Rizzuto / Jason Jin5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Vidit Desai
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.32
Cameron Leggett
published 3.5
3.28
Patrick Polhemus
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
David Mize
published 3
3.06
Jeff Rauber
published
3.00
David Hofberg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Scott Daniel
published
2.59
Alex Bryan
published 3
Tyler DeZubay
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vidit Desai
60W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Cameron Leggett
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Patrick Polhemus
38W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3
David Mize
40W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jeff Rauber
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
David Hofberg
34W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Alex Bryan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Tyler DeZubay
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.