Teams

GSTL18/Hickman/RLTC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-GSTL · Adult Men - 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-03vs GSTL18/Walden/GrandeDunesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hale / Michael Shank vs Jessel Elliott / Terry Walden1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesScott Leroux / Scott DeVaux vs Tom McKeever / Kenneth Santiago5-7, 3-6
2025-08-21vs GSTL18/Walden/GrandeDunesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew OBrien / Michael Shank vs Terry Walden / Warren de Villiers0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobert OBrien / Luke Elliott vs ROB SAPPENFIELD / Tom McKeever6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-24vs GSTL18/Walden/GrandeDunesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Loomis / Kurt Engelbert vs Jessel Elliott / ROB SAPPENFIELD0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLuke Elliott / Andrew OBrien vs Warren de Villiers / Kenneth Santiago1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Matthew Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew OBrien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Mark Loomis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Scott Leroux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Scott DeVaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Michael Shank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Douglas Bradshaw
published
Kurt Engelbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert OBrien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott DeVaux + Christopher Hickman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hale
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Andrew OBrien
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Loomis
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Scott Leroux
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Scott DeVaux
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Michael Shank
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christopher Hickman
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Douglas Bradshaw
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kurt Engelbert
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Luke Elliott
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert OBrien
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.