Teams

Stonebrook

2022 SVTA Adult 40 & Over Women · SVTA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-26vs Love BitesWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Minicucci / Barbara Tobler vs Lisa Furgal / Julie Collier6-3, 7-6
2022-07-19vs MiddleburgLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Roberta Lake vs Sharon Linares / Ruth Schierenbeck2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Minicucci vs Maria Costea6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-05vs WCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesPage Groseclose / Roberta Lake vs Niki Gerhard / Lauren Johnson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobbie Marchant / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Ebeth Peer / Debra Farrell6-3, 6-2
2022-06-28vs Nix/ProvidakesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoan Cestaro / Roberta Lake vs Paige Fishel / Tina Woods7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Tobler / Leslie Boyd vs Nicole Leppert / Staci Wooten3-6, 0-6
2022-06-23vs BessaWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoberta Lake / Carrie Seifert vs Jennifer Gick / Kate Putt6-2, 7-6
2022-06-21vs On the RiseLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Hopkins / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Anne Ward / Jennifer Yoon3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SVTA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Elizabeth Minicucci
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Roberta Lake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Robbie Marchant
published
3.05
Page Groseclose
published
3.03
Dana Kelly
published 3.5
2.93
Barbara Tobler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.63
Shirley McInturff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Minicucci + Roberta Lake13854% games+9.3% vs expected
Barbara Tobler + Page Groseclose134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Minicucci
65W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Roberta Lake
66W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Robbie Marchant
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Page Groseclose
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Dana Kelly
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Barbara Tobler
62W–116L career · 2 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
Shirley McInturff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.