Teams

Pancha

Adult 18 & Over Spring · 5.0 Women Central

10 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-06vs NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat ItSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmie Villarini / Carolina Lobel vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Adrienne Supino6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVanessa Schieber / Amanda Kaufman vs Kate Burke / Jill Olman0-6
2026-05-30vs NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat ItSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmie Villarini / Jill Pancha vs Danielle Hall / Amy Collins1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Hammond / Amy Ankeny vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Melissa Hammer6-0, 6-3
2026-05-17vs NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat ItSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Sharnak / Amy Ankeny vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Karin Weiner6-1, 5-3
L#2 DoublesHerma Ahlers / Amanda Kaufman vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Melissa Hammer6-7, 5-2, 0-1
2026-05-02vs NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat ItLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Hammond / Kei Imanishi vs Amy Collins / Danielle Hall2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElise Gerdes / Vanessa Schieber vs Kate Burke / Jill Olman4-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat ItLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Sharnak / Amy Ankeny vs Danielle Hall / Karin Weiner4-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesJill Pancha / Kei Imanishi vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Adrienne Supino0-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat ItLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Hammond / Amy Ankeny vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Amy Collins6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElise Gerdes / Amanda Kaufman vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Karin Weiner3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Women Central
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJD/2026 Don’t Sweat It0610819147
2Pancha0681022158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amie Villarini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.71
Amy Ankeny
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.40
Elise Gerdes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Debbie Sharnak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.37
Kei Imanishi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Herma Ahlers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Hammond
published 4.5
Daniela Kelley
published 4.5
4.15
Amanda Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Jill Pancha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Herma Ahlers + Kei Imanishi4155% gamesnot enough data
Jill Pancha + Amie Villarini044 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Kaufman + Jill Pancha213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Pancha + Elise Gerdes213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Pancha + Daniela Kelley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amie Villarini
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Amy Ankeny
44W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
4.5
Elise Gerdes
120W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
5
Debbie Sharnak
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Kei Imanishi
88W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
Herma Ahlers
38W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
4.5
Carol Hammond
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Daniela Kelley
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Amanda Kaufman
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.15
Jill Pancha
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.