Teams

Wright/Memphis

2023 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Neely Leavell
published
4.06
Emily Gallops
published
3.96
Hattie Rounder
published
3.90
Kate Stakem
published
3.70
Samantha Ransone
published
3.60
Grace Crenshaw
published
3.40
Latasha Echols
published
3.28
Wendi Mihalko
published
3.27
Haley Moore
published
3.25
Murre Foster
published
3.23
Rebecca Fitschen
published
3.18
Kelley Smith
published
3.10
Courtney Wright
published 3.5
2.79
Karen Kassen
published
Helen Hinds
published
Lee Leavell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Smith + Courtney Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Wright + Haley Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Hattie Rounder + Neely Leavell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neely Leavell
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
Emily Gallops
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
4.06
Hattie Rounder
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
Kate Stakem
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Samantha Ransone
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Grace Crenshaw
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Latasha Echols
31W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Wendi Mihalko
20W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Haley Moore
15W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Murre Foster
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.25
Rebecca Fitschen
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelley Smith
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Courtney Wright
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Kassen
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.79
Helen Hinds
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lee Leavell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.