Teams

CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Schaumburg Fujimoto Sun 10 $18

CDTA ESL 18 & Over W · E

14 players · average NTRP / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesTom Kastner / Zhefu Chen vs Nate Pualengco / Leo Kanev6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShusuke Kitamura / Masashi Hashimoto vs Chen Cheng / Howard Wu7-5, 2-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKannan Venkataraman / Kenta Oikawa vs Mark Streit / RICO de LARA3-6, 6-7
2021-12-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTsuyoshi Yamazaki vs Carlos Flores1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKenta Oikawa vs Jeff Snow2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMasashi Hashimoto / Shusuke Kitamura vs Greg Crossman / Matthew Shearer0-6, 3-6
2021-11-07Lost 02
L#2 SinglesNilay Shah vs Scott Drury1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDabeer Roshanali / Zhefu Chen vs Jim Waters / Michael Holt6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKaz Grover / Tom Kastner vs Larry GOLD / Jonathon Maas7-6, 1-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKenji Fujimoto / KOHEI YAMAMOTO vs Brian Benzer / Jason Wright1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTsuyoshi Yamazaki / Venkat Krishnamurthy vs Dennis Abdelnour / Daniel Michael3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesZhefu Chen vs Igor Koralnik3-6, 3-5
2021-10-17Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTsuyoshi Yamazaki vs Chad Anderson3-6, 5-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTsuyoshi Yamazaki / Tom Kastner vs Kevin Onorato / Kelcei Glasgow3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDabeer Roshanali / Nilay Shah vs Anthony Jackson / Orville Ankarlo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKannan Venkataraman / Nitin Maheshwari vs Tony Lyu / Kwaku Adjei-Bohyen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Wheaton Isphording Sun 2 $1763301534367
2CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Heritage Pillala Sat 6 $2163281742346
3CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M MT Chi Brown Sun 12 $2563281742368
4CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Schaumburg Fujimoto Sun 10 $1863232250399
5CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Tam Choi Sat 3 $2054242147397
6CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M MT Bann Cal Sun 2 $2554212452414
7CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M MT Pal Korczak Sun 1 $2536182758414
8CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Centennial Anderson Sat 5 $2036182761452
9CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Tam Rykhus Sun 11 $2036162965442
10CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5M Centennial Sioufi Sat 1 $2027192663443

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Shota Mochida
published
3.42
Zhefu Chen
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Tom Kastner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Junya Fukuda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
KOHEI YAMAMOTO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kannan Venkataraman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kaz Grover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kenji Fujimoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kenta Oikawa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Masashi Hashimoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nilay Shah
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Nitin Maheshwari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shusuke Kitamura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tsuyoshi Yamazaki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kannan Venkataraman + Tom Kastner2440% gamesnot enough data
Shusuke Kitamura + Masashi Hashimoto3350% gamesnot enough data
Junya Fukuda + KOHEI YAMAMOTO4159% gamesnot enough data
Kannan Venkataraman + Kenta Oikawa224 matchesnot enough data
Tom Kastner + Tsuyoshi Yamazaki044 matchesnot enough data
Tom Kastner + KOHEI YAMAMOTO314 matchesnot enough data
Tsuyoshi Yamazaki + Masashi Hashimoto404 matchesnot enough data
Kannan Venkataraman + Kenji Fujimoto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shota Mochida
25W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Zhefu Chen
48W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Tom Kastner
39W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Junya Fukuda
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
KOHEI YAMAMOTO
66W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kannan Venkataraman
26W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kaz Grover
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenji Fujimoto
29W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kenta Oikawa
61W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Masashi Hashimoto
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nilay Shah
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nitin Maheshwari
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Shusuke Kitamura
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tsuyoshi Yamazaki
42W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.