Teams

Mahaffey, Madison

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Women 4.0+

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-21vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 12
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Carmody vs Stacie Rector6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAnna Miskelly vs Kimberly Harrell0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMadison Mahaffey vs Chiali Register2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-12-20vs Do, JenniferWon 21
L#1 SinglesMadison Mahaffey vs Jessie Humble6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSumner Douglas vs Jennifer Do6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesElise Brewer vs Megan de Jong6-1, 6-3
2024-12-08Lost 12
W#1 SinglesKatie Trettin vs Catherine Lewis6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHayley Lohrisch vs Judith Mills0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesElise Brewer vs Kimberly Harrell4-6, 3-6
2024-11-17vs Do, JenniferLost 02
L#2 SinglesMacKenzie Carmody vs Jennifer Do4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAnna Miskelly vs Megan de Jong3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-06vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 12
W#1 SinglesKatie Trettin vs Catherine Lewis6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSumner Douglas vs Kimberly Harrell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesElise Brewer vs Chiali Register6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-20vs Do, JenniferWon 21
W#1 SinglesKatie Trettin vs Sarah Buffington7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHayley Lohrisch vs Jennifer Otto4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMadison Mahaffey vs Jennifer Do6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Elise Brewer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.52
Sumner Douglas
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.52
MacKenzie Carmody
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.43
Anna Miskelly
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.38
Madison Mahaffey
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.29
Hayley Lohrisch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Katie Trettin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MacKenzie Carmody + Sumner Douglas4253% games+10.7% vs expected
MacKenzie Carmody + Anna Miskelly6155% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elise Brewer
34W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.83
Sumner Douglas
40W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
MacKenzie Carmody
41W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Anna Miskelly
22W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
Madison Mahaffey
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Hayley Lohrisch
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
Katie Trettin
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.