Teams

BGibson (WSRC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Men - Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-01vs FGrindle (Weddington)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGeorge VanDyne / MAGESH ARUMUGAM vs George Koskinas / Ron Dock2-6, 2-6
2024-09-24vs AHunt (Matthews)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKen Klug / Andrew VanBlarcom vs David Whiteman / Douglas Skrainka3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMAGESH ARUMUGAM / Kevin Staley vs Jeff Johnson / Paul Gress4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesMAGESH ARUMUGAM / Ken Klug vs Alan Becker / Peter Mayo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-10vs KFranks (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew VanBlarcom / Ken Klug vs Justin D'Silva / Chuck Norton5-7, 3-6
2024-09-03vs JChung (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAndrew VanBlarcom / Russell Hughes vs CJ ONeill / Steve Rider6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Staley / Ken Klug vs Sean O'Brien / Leon Banchik1-6, 2-6
2024-08-27vs MHenninger (Raintree)Split 11
W#2 DoublesAndrew VanBlarcom / Russell Hughes vs Michael Fresina / Jared Horton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Lovelace / Graham Phillips vs Mark Fiddes / Owen Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-06vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKevin Staley / MAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Wynn Walker / Rick Haskell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBruce Gibson / Stephen Lovelace vs Trey Farley / Lawrence Kraujalis4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Andrew Lawler
published 3.5
3.27
Andrew VanBlarcom
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Kevin Staley
published
3.12
Dana Haake
published 3.5
3.06
Russell Hughes
published
3.00
Graham Phillips
published
2.99
Ken Klug
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Stephen Lovelace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Bruce Gibson
published 3
2.84
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Eloy ROY
published
George VanDyne
published
Sijo Joseph
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Lawler
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Andrew VanBlarcom
13W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kevin Staley
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Dana Haake
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Russell Hughes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
Graham Phillips
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Ken Klug
101W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Stephen Lovelace
40W–66L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Bruce Gibson
29W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
70W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Eloy ROY
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
George VanDyne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sijo Joseph
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.