Teams

JTC Jewell

2025 Alachua Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs WS McLaughlinWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Adkins / Heather Jewell vs Colleen Anderson / Jennifer Bogle6-2, 6-2
2025-11-22vs Alachua/BoothLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeah Stringer / Charlene Krueger vs Linda Garcia-Crespo / Marisa Rodriguez0-6, 0-6
2025-11-08vs WS McLaughlinLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeather Adkins / Nancy Smith vs Lindy Archambeau / Amy Feutz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Charlene Krueger vs MARY K WIMSETT / Jennifer Halinski6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-18vs WS McLaughlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Rodriguez / Heather Adkins vs Michelle Burns / Jennine Brandt2-6, 1-6
2025-10-11vs Alachua/BoothSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Jennison Searcy vs Faun Carlson / Angie Gomez6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Adkins / Julie Wang vs Julia Morrisroe / Lisa Booth7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Alachua/BoothLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Adkins / Terry Rodriguez vs Marlene Townsend / Patricia Woolley6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Heather Adkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Julie Wang
published
2.93
Melinda Hartline
published
2.86
Margaret Zerbe
published 3
2.83
Terry Rodriguez
published
2.80
Linda Sheehan
published
2.77
Diane Adkins
published 3
2.76
Heather Jewell
published
2.67
Jennison Searcy
published
2.33
Charlene Krueger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Marisa McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Adkins
116W–111L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Julie Wang
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Melinda Hartline
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Margaret Zerbe
27W–40L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Terry Rodriguez
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Linda Sheehan
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Diane Adkins
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Heather Jewell
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Jennison Searcy
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Charlene Krueger
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Marisa McLeod
81W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.