Teams

Daigle/18/8.5M/Combo/OCC

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 8.5 Laf (18&O) Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 6:00 PM
Oakbourne Country Club
Sep 17 6:00 PM
Red Lerille's Racquet & Health Club
Sep 24 6:00 PM
Oakbourne Country Club
Oct 1 6:00 PM
Red Lerille's Racquet & Health Club
Oct 8 6:00 PM
Oakbourne Country Club
2026-09-04vs Caletri/18/8.5M/Combo/RedsWon 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Hesse / Thibaut Decaluwe vs Carson Powell / Jason Crockett7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNathanael Arnold / Carter Brinkman vs Ben Pok / Nicholas Caletri6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-27vs Caletri/18/8.5M/Combo/RedsLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Hesse / Paul Anderson vs Ben Pok / Seth Guilbeau6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Holland / Carter Brinkman vs Jason Crockett / Hab Barton3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-20vs Caletri/18/8.5M/Combo/RedsLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Hesse / Thibaut Decaluwe vs Kyle Nunez / Sean Henagan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Savoy / Daniel Holland vs Nicholas Caletri / Carson Powell4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Gesser / Nathanael Arnold vs Jim Bourgeois / Michael Breaux4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Laf (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Caletri/18/8.5M/Combo/Reds000000
2Daigle/18/8.5M/Combo/OCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Paul Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Holland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Christopher Cook
published 4
3.92
William Gesser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Christopher Savoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Thomas Hesse
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Nathanael Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thibaut Decaluwe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Trent Daigle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Hesse + Thibaut Decaluwe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Anderson
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Daniel Holland
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Christopher Cook
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
William Gesser
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Christopher Savoy
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Thomas Hesse
47W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Nathanael Arnold
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thibaut Decaluwe
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trent Daigle
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.