Teams

Montclair

2022 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJena Olsen / Jared Rowe vs Tatiane Restani / Romeo Cinco3-6, 4-6
2022-02-26vs FXBG 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Gudyka / Ronald Embry vs Karen Gillespie / Quentin Carter1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Earley / Snowden Bristow vs Tatiane Restani / Ralph Agpaoa0-6, 2-6
2022-02-19vs FXBG 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJena Olsen / Ronald Embry vs Karen Gillespie / Owen Seely1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEverett Diederiks / Laura Earley vs Brita Robinson / Romeo Cinco4-6, 2-6
2022-02-12vs FXBG 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd May / Jena Olsen vs Marie Taylor / Naveen Chennupati5-7, 2-6
2022-02-05vs FXBG 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Ward Jr / Kim Gudyka vs Quentin Carter / Alicia Rowley4-6, 1-2
2022-01-29vs FXBG 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Morehead / Jena Olsen vs Ralph Agpaoa / Laura Smith2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJena Olsen / Brandon Ward Jr vs Blake Traeger / Tatiane Restani7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Morehead
published 4.5
4.15
Jena Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Laura Earley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Kim Gudyka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
3.52
Luis Aragon
published
Karna Hyman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jena Olsen + Luis Aragon044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandon Morehead
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jena Olsen
38W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Laura Earley
83W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Kim Gudyka
55W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Everett Diederiks
19W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Luis Aragon
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
Karna Hyman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.