Teams

Austin/18/4.5/NON/CAPS

2024 NO Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 4.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-16vs Green/18/4.5/NON/XUSplit 22
L#1 DoublesZuzka Haider / Celeste Mule vs Rodnelle Hadley / Alice Dixon6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndre Judice vs Brandy Green6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobin Austin / Stephanie Newell vs Farah Baklouti / Elvia D'Orcy1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKayla Jones / Zoe Tran vs Samantha Brooks / Mary Thatcher6-0, 7-5
2024-04-08vs Bourgeois/18/4.5/NON/CPWon 32
W#1 DoublesRobin Austin / Kayla Jones vs Anne Johnson / Monica Bourgeois6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Newell vs Ann Melius7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNatalie Frith / Rachel Reeder vs Heather Grant / Jennifer Poulin7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz vs Jo Schernbeck3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Maher / Hannah Schmucker vs Kaylyn Blosser / Darbi Philibert2-6, 2-6
2024-04-01vs Green/18/4.5/NON/XULost 12
W#1 DoublesZuzka Haider / Celeste Mule vs Aimee Thomas / Shannon Fortenberry6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaire Lewis vs Angela Chopin5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz / Stephanie Newell vs Farah Baklouti / Samantha Brooks1-6, 1-6
2024-03-27vs Roddy/18/4.5/NON/NOLTCLost 13
W#1 DoublesCeleste Mule / Zuzka Haider vs Kathryn Talbot / Amy Farnsworth7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz vs Mary Ball2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Schmucker vs Claire Karas5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Austin / Kayla Jones vs Karen Eastman / Ginny Wirth6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-18vs Bourgeois/18/4.5/NON/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesClaire Lewis / Celeste Mule vs Monica Bourgeois / Anne Johnson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Maher / Robin Austin vs Darbi Philibert / Alex Zieman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Baker / Zoe Tran vs Ann Melius / Jennifer Poulin3-6, 6-7
2024-03-13vs Green/18/4.5/NON/XULost 23
L#1 DoublesKayla Jones / Zoe Tran vs Elvia D'Orcy / Farah Baklouti2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAndre Judice vs Brandy Green6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZuzka Haider / Celeste Mule vs Shannon Fortenberry / Rodnelle Hadley7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesClaire Lewis vs Angela Chopin6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Reeder / Megan Maher vs Aimee Thomas / Samantha Brooks5-7, 2-6
2024-02-26vs Roddy/18/4.5/NON/NOLTCLost 14
L#1 DoublesStephanie Newell / Kayla Jones vs Meredith Montgomery / Ginny Wirth3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Lewis vs Mary Ball4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Austin / Michelle Baker vs Kathryn Talbot / Sarah Evans1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz vs Maryanne Pranikoff3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Reeder / Natalie Frith vs Mary-Marshall Seaver / Chrissy Connolly6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-21vs Bourgeois/18/4.5/NON/CPWon 32
W#1 DoublesZuzka Haider / Celeste Mule vs Ann Melius / Jennifer Poulin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz vs Monica Bourgeois4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesZoe Tran / Michelle Baker vs Darbi Philibert / Elizabeth Merrick4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesClaire Lewis vs Anne Johnson6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHannah Schmucker / Megan Maher vs Adrienne Wolf / Jo Schernbeck6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-29vs Roddy/18/4.5/NON/NOLTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / Celeste Mule vs Sarah Jackson / Mary Ball6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesClaire Lewis vs Susan Taylor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz / Rachel Reeder vs Sarah Evans / Kim Roddy2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Austin / Stephanie Newell vs Claire Karas / Kathryn Talbot6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green/18/4.5/NON/XU81301539347
2Roddy/18/4.5/NON/NOLTC54271842344
3Austin/18/4.5/NON/CAPS45192658418
4Bourgeois/18/4.5/NON/CP18143168476

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Zuzka Haider
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.33
Zoe Tran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andre Judice
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Claire Lewis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Celeste Mule
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.09
Natalie Frith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.91
Robin Austin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Hannah Schmucker
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.54
Trezmarie Zotkiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Megan Maher
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Rachel Reeder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Newell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Mule + Zuzka Haider7357% games+4.1% vs expected
Robin Austin + Claire Lewis2446% games−0.1% vs expected
Claire Lewis + Trezmarie Zotkiewicz1636% games−0.6% vs expected
Stephanie Newell + Robin Austin2343% games−4.0% vs expected
Robin Austin + Natalie Frith314 matchesnot enough data
Megan Maher + Hannah Schmucker044 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Schmucker + Zoe Tran314 matchesnot enough data
Robin Austin + Trezmarie Zotkiewicz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zuzka Haider
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.45
Zoe Tran
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Andre Judice
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Claire Lewis
26W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Celeste Mule
16W–11L career · 7 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
Natalie Frith
37W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
4.09
Robin Austin
46W–35L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Hannah Schmucker
21W–41L career · 8 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
Trezmarie Zotkiewicz
16W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Megan Maher
19W–34L career · 10 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Rachel Reeder
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Newell
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.