Teams

Bake - Point Break

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bakersfield

18 players · average NTRP 3.35 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-15vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrooke Fernandez / Erika Gatson vs Hyejung Oh / Opal Devine4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessie Blackwell vs Amy Meger5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Wetterholm / Cheyanne Antongiovanni vs Edyta Grant / Erin Black3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRosemarie Galindo / Christy Hornbuckle vs Susan Frakes / Rhonda Slegers1-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasLost 04
L#1 DoublesCheyanne Antongiovanni / Christy Hornbuckle vs Hyejung Oh / Marites Idica1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNicola Wright vs Brooke Drake1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessie Blackwell / Cheryl Garone vs Linh Bui / Erin Black2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMisty Haverstock / Lauren Huynh vs Amy Meger / Rhonda Slegers2-6, 4-6
2025-02-07vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJessie Blackwell / Nicola Wright vs Gioconda Erquiaga / Samantha Pankey7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrooke Fernandez vs Linh Bui4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Wetterholm / Briana Zaninovich vs Marites Idica / Kristin Weber1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Garone / Misty Haverstock vs Opal Devine / Ashley Periera7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrooke Fernandez / Cheryl Garone vs Amy Meger / Samantha Pankey6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Nicola Wright vs Edyta Grant / Susan Frakes3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Wetterholm / Agnes DeJong vs Marites Idica / Brooke Drake3-6, 1-6
2025-01-19vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesCrystal Neptune / Minda Owens vs Linette Holliday / Amy Meger2-6, 1-6
2025-01-12vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarri Tillema / Beverly Wetterholm vs Rhonda Slegers / Marites Idica3-6, 3-6
2025-01-05vs LLW - Bake - Drop Shot DivasLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Marri Tillema vs Ashley South / Erin Black1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMinda Owens vs Linh Bui2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 - Bakersfield have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheyanne Antongiovanni
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Brooke Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jessie Blackwell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Beverly Wetterholm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Lauren Huynh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Agnes DeJong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Crystal Neptune
published 3.5
3.05
Cheryl Garone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Briana Zaninovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Michelle Pisano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Miranda Hwang
published
3.03
Erika Gatson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Christy Hornbuckle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Nicola Wright
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Minda Owens
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Misty Haverstock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rosemarie Galindo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+10.4% vs expected
Jessie Blackwell + Lauren Huynh404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brooke Fernandez
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jessie Blackwell
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
Beverly Wetterholm
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Lauren Huynh
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Crystal Neptune
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Garone
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Briana Zaninovich
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Miranda Hwang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Erika Gatson
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3.5
Christy Hornbuckle
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Nicola Wright
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Misty Haverstock
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemarie Galindo
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.