Teams

HRCA-S BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-10vs PCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Anderson / Nancy Montini vs Heidi Lewis / Ann Siebert4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Haberman / Robyn Henslin vs Carol Caflisch / Maria Hush5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Madrid / Suzanne Kwilman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-03vs SS-LT REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Kwilman / Dana Anderson vs Brenda Lillard / Lois Green1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Parrish / Nancy Montini vs Jennifer Cree / Kathy Breth5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Jennifer Madrid vs Karen McIntire / Samantha Kirschke2-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs PCRK ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Montini / Nicola Zalkind vs Carol Lugo / Lori McDevitt0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Julie Johns vs Carol Brohl / Sheila Curry3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Jennifer Madrid vs Marcia Nash / Cynthia Glasier5-7, 2-6
2026-05-20vs SS-LT YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Anderson / Julie Johns vs Lynne Monnar / Diane Lopez4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Parrish / Robyn Henslin vs Barbara Hall / Carol Decker4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kwilman / Jennifer Madrid vs Bernadette Rottschafer / Karen Eagleton6-7, 1-6
2026-05-13vs VCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Johns / Robyn Henslin vs Marnie Brockamp / Elizabeth Quinn4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Haberman / Jennifer Madrid vs Kathy Dosen / Emily Yeingst4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Carol Parrish vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-06vs PRC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Nancy Montini vs Cynthia Kruger / Danita Geise5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Carol Parrish vs Karla Davies / Keenan Young6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Johns / Kathy Haberman vs Henriette Nash / Elizabeth Anderson4-6, 2-6
2026-04-29vs CPV GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Montini / Julie Johns vs Jill Fox / Jami Keenan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Kathy Haberman vs Debbie Conner / Angela Emery6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Suzanne Kwilman vs Liz Bauer / Stephanie Lanziner0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Nancy Montini
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Dana Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Jennifer Madrid
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Nicola Zalkind
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Suzanne Kwilman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Julie Johns
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
Carol Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
Kathy Haberman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Robyn Henslin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Anderson + Julie Johns21144% games+1.6% vs expected
Nancy Montini + Carol Parrish81149% games+1.6% vs expected
Nancy Montini + Nicola Zalkind6355% games−0.8% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Nicola Zalkind1540% games−4.7% vs expected
Nicola Zalkind + Carol Parrish033 matchesnot enough data
Nicola Zalkind + Julie Johns123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Haberman + Julie Johns033 matchesnot enough data
Carol Parrish + Julie Johns123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Montini
119W–86L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dana Anderson
11W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Madrid
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Nicola Zalkind
69W–109L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Suzanne Kwilman
70W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Julie Johns
29W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Carol Parrish
14W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Kathy Haberman
46W–82L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Robyn Henslin
6W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.