Teams

Polk - Winter Haven/Denise Saltman

2021 Polk Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-17vs Winter Haven - David SaltmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDenise Saltman / Brian Swinney vs Allison Guerra / Charles Counter1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNaveen Kumria / Elisa Buffington vs Rebecca Henderson / Otis Cutshaw6-1, 6-0
2021-04-10vs Winter Haven - David SaltmanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrian Swinney / Daniela Schick vs James Whitaker / Rebecca Henderson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNaveen Kumria / Elisa Buffington vs Joe Hignight / Allison Guerra4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-04-03vs Winter Haven - David SaltmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElisa Buffington / Naveen Kumria vs Paige Turner / Charles Counter0-1
W#2 DoublesArabia Brakefield / John Chambliss vs Michele Moses / Otis Cutshaw6-2, 6-0
2021-04-03vs Winter Haven - David SaltmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniela Schick / NORMAN PAYNE IV vs Rebecca Henderson / Paul Mankowski4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesArabia Brakefield / John Chambliss vs Alisa Wolfe / Brian Marston4-6, 4-6
2021-03-20vs Winter Haven - David SaltmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Saltman / Brian Swinney vs Charles Counter / Paige Turner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesArabia Brakefield / John Chambliss vs Joe Hignight / Allison Guerra3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNORMAN PAYNE IV / Elisa Buffington vs Brian Marston / Michele Moses6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Charlton Johnson
published 4.5
3.94
Elisa Buffington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brian Swinney
published 4
3.71
Arabia Brakefield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Naveen Kumria
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Daniela Schick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Denise Saltman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Sonya Braudway
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisa Buffington + Naveen Kumria4454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlton Johnson
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Elisa Buffington
291W–167L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Brian Swinney
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Arabia Brakefield
164W–119L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Naveen Kumria
52W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Daniela Schick
82W–85L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Denise Saltman
159W–134L career · 2 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Sonya Braudway
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.