Teams

Mixed Menace

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Mixed 8.0 - MIXED 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-25vs BryanWon 30
W#1 DoublesCyndy Boorman / Taylor Neville vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Sobhan Patnaik6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Douglas Weber vs Kim Bryan / James Skillings6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrandi Cornelison / Aaron Brown vs Derick Thompson / Ranay Thompson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-22vs ServivorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Pacis / Cyndy Boorman vs Tristan Drollinger / Tresa Mason2-2
W#2 DoublesAaron Brown / Jennifer Crofts vs Bobby Arteaga / Alycia Robertson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Neville / Jason Neville vs Aaron Russell / Erica Clayton4-6, 4-6
2025-02-18vs RalstonLost 12
W#1 DoublesDouglas Weber / Cyndy Boorman vs Matthew Houser / Heather Silverman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTaylor Neville / Tiffany Zweifel vs Stephanie Ralston / Troy Barnum5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Christopher Pacis vs Pierce Bolton / Lexi Fullmer2-6, 3-6
2025-02-15vs BryanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Taylor Neville vs Alicia Woodhouse / Royce Woodhouse2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCyndy Boorman / Aaron Brown vs Jacqualyn Nelson / James Skillings7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs ServivorsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Douglas Weber vs Tresa Mason / Tristan Drollinger6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTaylor Neville / Jennifer Crofts vs Aaron Russell / Erica Clayton1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCyndy Boorman / Aaron Brown vs Alycia Robertson / Scott Stosich3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-01vs RalstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Zweifel / Taylor Neville vs Kelly Somsen / Cory Robertson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Brown / Brandi Cornelison vs Stephanie Ralston / Troy Barnum1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJason Neville / Tamara Neville vs Jennifer Lloyd / Antonio Tahhan6-2, 6-2
2025-01-31vs BryanLost 12
W#1 DoublesTamara Neville / Jason Neville vs Kim Bryan / James Skillings4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTaylor Neville / Tiffany Zweifel vs Alicia Woodhouse / Royce Woodhouse3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrandi Cornelison / Aaron Brown vs Sobhan Patnaik / Lisa Wheeler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-25vs ServivorsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Weber / Tiffany Zweifel vs Scott Stosich / Alycia Robertson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Neville / Tamara Neville vs Travis Baker / Hailey Winegar6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTaylor Neville / Jennifer Crofts vs Tristan Drollinger / Erica Clayton2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed 8.0 - MIXED 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ralston7116819195
2Mixed Menace26111331224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cyndy Boorman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Tiffany Zweifel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Jennifer Crofts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christopher Pacis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Melanie Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Douglas Weber
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Brandi Cornelison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Aaron Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jason Neville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tamara Neville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Taylor Neville
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Neville + Tamara Neville6354% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Nelson + Douglas Weber224 matchesnot enough data
Aaron Brown + Cyndy Boorman224 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Cornelison + Aaron Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Nelson + Aaron Brown033 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Zweifel + Taylor Neville033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cyndy Boorman
59W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Tiffany Zweifel
35W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.79
4
Jennifer Crofts
71W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Christopher Pacis
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Melanie Nelson
87W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Douglas Weber
78W–86L career · 8 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Brandi Cornelison
82W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Aaron Brown
54W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jason Neville
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Neville
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Neville
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.