Teams

10 Westwood Baker

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-03vs 1 MTC JacobsenLost 03
L#1 SinglesNJ Placentra vs Christopher Geoghegan3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrian Holder vs Dane Lamendola2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSacha Shaygan vs Christopher Quirk2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBrian Holder vs Michael Steele4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKennon Harrison vs Tucker Cole6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDaniel McCool vs Jason Yost6-3, 6-1
2025-10-20vs 6 Chestnut Oaks 2.0 - CargiuloWon 21
W#1 SinglesJarrett Williams vs Andrew Arakas7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesGarrett O'Shea vs Nicholas Kaplan6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSacha Shaygan vs Sam Berg2-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs 14 WOCC 3.5 Singles - MullinaxWon 21
W#1 SinglesProcter Fishburne vs William Waddell6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKennon Harrison vs Scott Boyle6-4, 7-5
L#3 SinglesCory Snyder vs Shawn Harwood6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-04vs 13 Avalon Singlets - BeldingWon 21
W#1 SinglesDaniel McCool vs Jesse Pasco6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJarrett Williams vs Todd Milligan2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesGarrett O'Shea vs Kristopher Johnson6-1, 6-0
2025-09-22vs 11 Kanawha BarrangerLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrian Holder vs STEVEN ROBERTS6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesProcter Fishburne vs Creighton Anders6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCory Snyder vs Sam Cohen2-6, 3-6
2025-09-15vs 9 Raintree PrestiaWon 30
W#1 SinglesNJ Placentra vs Don Ha6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKennon Harrison vs Jay Harter6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCory Snyder vs James Dau6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Daniel McCool
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.57
Brian Holder
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Procter Fishburne
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.36
Garrett O'Shea
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Jarrett Williams
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.26
Kennon Harrison
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.15
NJ Placentra
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Cory Snyder
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.91
Sacha Shaygan
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel McCool
32W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Brian Holder
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Procter Fishburne
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Garrett O'Shea
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Jarrett Williams
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kennon Harrison
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
NJ Placentra
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Cory Snyder
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Sacha Shaygan
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.