Teams

LTFC RED

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.85 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-15vs SSLT REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesWes Anthony / Anasa Shank vs Edward Hynek / Sandy Biley6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Stefan Paulsson vs Heidi Elliott / Robert Hall6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCeline Ormond / John Randazzo vs Scott Ungar / Carol Lail6-2, 6-3
2022-05-08vs WC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Lash / Alecxis Naviaux vs Mary Ann Martin / Henry Sanin6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Stefan Paulsson vs MaryBeth Doerr / Michael Doherty3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCeline Ormond / John Randazzo vs Virginia Gamble / Bob Gamble6-3, 6-1
2022-05-01vs GCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusana Wanken / Wes Anthony vs CJ Kaelberer / Allison Kaelberer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSviatlana Yasianovich / Steven Naviaux vs Sean Raftery / Karen Raftery6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Stefan Paulsson vs Douglas McDonald / Hilary McDonald6-2, 7-5
2022-04-24vs EM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSviatlana Yasianovich / AJ Howard vs Michele Olree / Ken Huskey7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Lash / Alecxis Naviaux vs Stephanie Davy / Adam Davy6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusana Wanken / Wes Anthony vs Jean Steimel / David Steimel6-4, 6-2
2022-04-17vs PRC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Naviaux / Sviatlana Yasianovich vs Jeremy Mayoss / Morgan Mayoss3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Lash / Alecxis Naviaux vs Jacob Stadelman / Erin Jones7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Stefan Paulsson vs Douglas Jones / Laura Jones7-6, 7-5
2022-04-10vs KNO REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesCeline Ormond / Stefan Paulsson vs Ryan Nance / Barb Richards6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSviatlana Yasianovich / Wes Anthony vs Elizabeth Baesman / Eric Lownsberry6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAJ Howard / Susana Wanken vs Kim Haverly / Tim Wilson6-2, 6-2
2022-04-03vs HG BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusana Wanken / John Randazzo vs Amy Silverman / Andy Silverman4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSteven Naviaux / Christine Paulsson vs Lynn Price / Todd Price6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlecxis Naviaux / David Lash vs Jennifer Henkel / Jason Henkel6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Alecxis Naviaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
AJ Howard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Celine Ormond
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Christine Paulsson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Sviatlana Yasianovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Anasa Shank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Susana Wanken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Wes Anthony
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
David Lash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Steven Naviaux
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
John Randazzo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Stefan Paulsson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Michael Wasserman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alecxis Naviaux + Steven Naviaux171354% games+5.1% vs expected
Anasa Shank + Wes Anthony8354% games+2.7% vs expected
Christine Paulsson + Stefan Paulsson16458% games+2.6% vs expected
David Lash + Christine Paulsson3358% games+0.9% vs expected
David Lash + Alecxis Naviaux404 matchesnot enough data
Susana Wanken + Wes Anthony314 matchesnot enough data
Celine Ormond + Stefan Paulsson044 matchesnot enough data
Celine Ormond + John Randazzo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alecxis Naviaux
69W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
AJ Howard
55W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Celine Ormond
77W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Christine Paulsson
113W–87L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Sviatlana Yasianovich
82W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Anasa Shank
100W–51L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Susana Wanken
146W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Wes Anthony
85W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
David Lash
86W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Steven Naviaux
78W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
John Randazzo
64W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Stefan Paulsson
25W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Michael Wasserman
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.