Teams

Poole/LR/Rebs

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-09vs Simmons/Junior/LR/OCWon 20
W#1 DoublesGabriel Womack / Danele Poole vs Bobby Perry / Ann Perry6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNicholas Poole / Lacey Watts vs Michael Shepherd / Mollie Birch6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Bernadette Stanford
published 3.5
3.31
Jill Childers
published
3.28
Miles Newey
published
3.25
Nicholas Poole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Danele Poole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Eric Baker
published 3.5
2.92
Kharyssa Brown
published
2.85
Andrew Kincaid
published 3
2.81
Calandra Bucella
published 3
2.70
Cheiko Stewart
published 3
2.66
Martinez Dupree
published
Nancy-Gail Purnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miles Newey + Danele Poole314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bernadette Stanford
31W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
Jill Childers
35W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Miles Newey
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Nicholas Poole
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Danele Poole
20W–12L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Eric Baker
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kharyssa Brown
31W–50L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Andrew Kincaid
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Calandra Bucella
40W–38L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cheiko Stewart
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Martinez Dupree
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
Nancy-Gail Purnell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.