← Teams

THPRD-Matsumori

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Michael Sather
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Deanna Lautenbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Scott Holland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Coral Nash
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Patrick Harkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.22
Dan Boren
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
—
Albert Hensley
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-12-01Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Michael Sather vs Shaina Yeung / Christopher Yeung6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Sather / Albert Hensley vs Kelly Mohr / Steve Vanderploeg6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Russ Martinelli vs Charles Taguet / Kana Wakamatsu6-2, 6-4
2018-11-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMichael Davis / Coral Nash vs Sandi Bittler / Jonathan Eames6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuss Martinelli / Rie Sasakawa vs Mark Seneker / Susan Dussault6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Holland / Yoriko Matsumori vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-11-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Coral Nash vs Raini Spitze / Rusty Williams6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Sather / Albert Hensley vs Mary Bullard / Brian Dehen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Holland / Yoriko Matsumori vs Jon Monson / Cathie Recker4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJill Sather / Albert Hensley vs Robby Lafleur / Craig Williams6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Davis / Coral Nash vs Anne Fahlbusch / Ian Fudalla6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeanna Lautenbach / Dan Boren vs Sharon Grilley / Kevin Heller6-3, 6-3
2018-10-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Sather / Vivian Nguyen vs Tom Lonergan / Kris Kelly-Koster6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesScott Holland / Rie Sasakawa vs Heather Watkins / Jeff Hammonds6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2018-10-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Coral Nash vs Jennifer Simmons / Cord Speelman6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeanna Lautenbach / Dan Boren vs Thomas McGirk / Cathy Epperson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2018-09-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDan Boren / Rie Sasakawa vs Eugene Jung / Tonya Dirk6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Sather / Vivian Nguyen vs Adam Gamboa / Kira Dennison Capen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlbert Hensley / Jill Sather vs David Greenberg / Emiko Kogure3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-09-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesYoriko Matsumori / Patrick Harkin vs Robby Lafleur / Craig Williams6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Michael Sather vs Ian Fudalla / Kay Dobashi6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeanna Lautenbach / Dan Boren vs Sue Harrison / Dave Cobban7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Michael Sather
43W–69L career
48%52%0%
3.87
4.5
Deanna Lautenbach
55W–83L career
55%45%0%
3.85
4
Scott Holland
36W–30L career
0%98%1%
3.81
4.5
Coral Nash
39W–69L career
67%33%0%
3.80
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Patrick Harkin
88W–69L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36
3.5
Dan Boren
44W–39L career
8%89%2%
3.22
0
Albert Hensley
29W–44L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.