Teams

SD 3.5 CTC/ West

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-21vs SD 3.5 LJTC/ BrunoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelli Marovish / Connie Kocherga vs Holly Henderson / Sherrie Black7-5, 6-3
2024-11-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelli Marovish / Connie Kocherga vs Simone Goldman / Michelle Kearney6-1, 6-2
2024-11-07vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Elia / Jennifer Vernallis vs Paige Hazard / Irene Coppedge6-3, 6-1
2024-10-31vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ IxtlahuacWon 20
W#2 DoublesJessica Cunningham / Debora Rozen vs Lisa Shirley / Herta Ixtlahuac6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Elia / Kelli Marovish vs Cynthia Hensersky / Sylvia Devoe6-2, 6-3
2024-10-17vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ PonceLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebora Rozen / Jennifer Vernallis vs Irma Ibarra / JACQUELINE SAENZ1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFrida Kalach / Debora Rozen vs Lisa Mallory / Katy Falkowski3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-03vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon & GarveySplit 11
W#2 DoublesFrida Kalach / Debora Rozen vs Carrie Musicant / Heather Ravenscroft6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Elia / Kelli Marovish vs Irene Steinwinder / Krista Losito2-6, 5-7
2024-09-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelli Marovish / Connie Kocherga vs Joan Fahrenthold / Heather Grimes6-3, 6-2
2024-09-19vs SD 3.5 PTC/ WoodWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebora Rozen / Jennifer Vernallis vs Sonia Peterson / Shelly Patriquin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Yvonne Hwang
published
3.51
Debora Rozen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Kelli Marovish
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Megan West
published
3.25
Diana Elia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Connie Kocherga
published 3.5
3.15
Erin Enrico
published
3.08
Ruth York
published
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Elia + Kelli Marovish27859% games+3.2% vs expected
Megan West + Debora Rozen3450% games−0.9% vs expected
Kelli Marovish + Megan West134 matchesnot enough data
Diana Elia + Connie Kocherga033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yvonne Hwang
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Debora Rozen
90W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Kelli Marovish
96W–74L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Megan West
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Diana Elia
58W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Connie Kocherga
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Erin Enrico
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Ruth York
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Vernallis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.