Teams

Love All, 3rd Set

2025 Corpus Christi Tri Level USTA League · Ladies 4.5 and below Tri Level

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-05vs Smash HitSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelody Garcia / Rebecca Pina vs Audra Chester / Stacy Hinze3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Ellsworth / Ashley Ley vs Denise Garrett / Ame Ferguson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Smash HitLost 03
L#1 DoublesEstephania Ruiz / Lauren Hill vs Linnie Ford / Cynthia Blust2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlondra Rocha / Julia Garcia vs Hazel Manjarris / Stephanie Hastings5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Ellsworth / Juanita Garza vs Jane Huston / Jeannel Hinton5-7, 1-6
2025-10-04vs Smash HitLost 03
L#1 DoublesEstephania Ruiz / Melody Garcia vs Linnie Ford / Cynthia Blust6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Pina / Nancy Barrera vs Audra Chester / Hazel Manjarris1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Ley / Juanita Garza vs Jane Huston / Jeannel Hinton2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 4.5 and below Tri Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smash Hit3081458
2Love All, 3rd Set031817103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Estephania Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Alondra Rocha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Melody Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Nancy Barrera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Rebecca Pina
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Julia Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Ashley Ley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.30
Juanita Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Kathleen Ellsworth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Estephania Ruiz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alondra Rocha
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.06
Melody Garcia
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Nancy Barrera
34W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Rebecca Pina
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Julia Garcia
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Ashley Ley
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.50
Juanita Garza
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Kathleen Ellsworth
28W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Lauren Hill
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.