Teams

55 & Over W7.0 - SF Carmen G. Padial

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W7.0-Flight 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-26vs 55 & Over W7.0 - Ilia ColomWon 10
W#1 DoublesALICIA SAGASTI / Graciana Gonzalez vs Coral Elizalde / Maritza Rivera6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAilsa Delgado / Nora Capriles vs Ana Garcia / Elizabeth Ocasio7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesALICIA SAGASTI / Graciana Gonzalez vs Maritza Rivera / Elizabeth Rios3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-06vs 55 & Over W7.0 - CTH Sandra AgostoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesALICIA SAGASTI / Graciana Gonzalez vs Dulce Cruz / Alicia Figueroa4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMari Carmen Bosch / Nora Capriles vs Lorna Marrero-Rivera / Mayra Seguinot2-6, 2-6
2022-02-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMari Carmen Bosch / Nora Capriles vs Teresa Lebron-Batista / Marcelle Shub5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGraciana Gonzalez / ALICIA SAGASTI vs Elizabeth Ocasio / Milagros Martir1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W7.0-Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mari Carmen Bosch
published
3.51
Maria Suarez
published
3.26
Evelyn Mathieu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Graciana Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.05
ALICIA SAGASTI
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Carmen Padial
published 3
Carmen Santos
published 3
2.72
Ailsa Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Melissa Glass
published
Lourdes Mendez
published
Myra Acevedo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nora Capriles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Myra Acevedo + Ailsa Delgado131451% games−5.0% vs expected
Graciana Gonzalez + ALICIA SAGASTI123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mari Carmen Bosch
25W–9L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Maria Suarez
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Evelyn Mathieu
44W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Graciana Gonzalez
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
ALICIA SAGASTI
91W–59L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Carmen Padial
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carmen Santos
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ailsa Delgado
61W–94L career · 9 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Melissa Glass
20W–37L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.41
Lourdes Mendez
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Myra Acevedo
40W–48L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nora Capriles
14W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.