Teams

Empire

2024 Tri Level Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-04vs BuppLost 02
L#2 DoublesMitch Linder / Greg Irwin vs Adam Besch-Turner / Nick Hunter1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTim Lyon / Benjamin Webb vs Skip Horn / Graham Brown1-6, 3-6
2024-01-13vs Wolf PackLost 03
L#1 DoublesJunda Qu / Sylvain Della-Torre vs Josh Gingrich / Eugene Kobyakov3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMatt Nespoli / Mitch Linder vs Ryan Mott / Amit Revankar3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJesse Allen / Benjamin Webb vs Matthew Rieck / Scott Fairchild4-6, 6-7
2024-01-07vs ROC: All Love No FightLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Nespoli / Mitch Linder vs Kyle Sherry / William Spencer2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJunda Qu / Sylvain Della-Torre vs Trevor Ritchie / Gavrail Tatarliev4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim Lyon / Benjamin Webb vs Ankur Mody / Aldo Mey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-12-17vs Unit TurnLost 02
L#1 DoublesSylvain Della-Torre / Junda Qu vs Gilbert Collins / Mark Wlodarczyk6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim Lyon / Aurelian Niculescu vs Mark Orloff / Shashank Trivedi3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROC: Dyson/Tran5113512133
2Wolf Pack5112612142
3Bundick2481022179
4Midtown0521327171
5Empire0501530184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mitch Linder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Tim Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Jesse Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Benjamin Webb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Aurelian Niculescu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Greg Irwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Junda Qu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sylvain Della-Torre
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvain Della-Torre + Junda Qu2350% games+7.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitch Linder
0W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.39
Tim Lyon
9W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.15
Jesse Allen
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Benjamin Webb
12W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Aurelian Niculescu
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Greg Irwin
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Junda Qu
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sylvain Della-Torre
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.