Teams

The Mojitos

2023 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-09vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlison Serino / Rosemary Gwynn vs Megan Kessler / Norma Mendelson3-6, 1-6
2023-12-01vs Simply SmashingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlison Serino / Cecilia Jones vs Stephanie Richards / Linda Rotiroti3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Shalen Fairbanks vs Linda Gowen / Meaghan McHugh1-6, 4-6
2023-11-14vs RubinoLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Gorrick / Nancy Trimble vs Tria Thalman / Penelope Bell1-6, 3-6
2023-11-06vs MaciaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlison Serino / Maria Gorrick vs Betsy Mencher / Angela Ferguson6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Melissa Foxman vs Yvette Fontenot / Liz Price6-7, 0-6
2023-10-26vs Simply SmashingLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Trimble / Alison Serino vs Stephanie Richards / Meglyn Lansing6-7, 2-6
2023-10-20vs PapadropshotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hayes-Gehrke / Alison Serino vs Maria Vassileva / Sandy Horowitz1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-15vs RubinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Rosemary Gwynn vs Michelle Stas / Katya Vert-Wong4-6, 1-6
2023-10-10vs MaciaLost 01
L#1 DoublesElba Morales / Nancy Trimble vs Carol Gover / Telesia Hundley4-6, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Shalen Fairbanks
published
3.33
Desiree Nichtula
published 3.5
3.17
Darcie Hammer
published 3.5
2.94
Nancy Trimble
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.81
Elba Morales
published
Polyxena Speros
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Trimble + Alison Serino3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Jones
48W–53L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Shalen Fairbanks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Desiree Nichtula
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Darcie Hammer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 5 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.94
Melissa Hayes-Gehrke
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.81
Elba Morales
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Polyxena Speros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.