Teams

CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-04vs SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie A Vucina / Deirdre Zamler vs Chizuko Heney / Audrey Naylor2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-02vs RIO DEL MAR 65AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Moran / Deirdre Zamler vs Katie Hart / Vicky Yakobovich7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-28vs SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie A Vucina / Deirdre Zamler vs Alicia Escobar-Roppel / Liz Castignani6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-26vs RIO DEL MAR 65AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Forlini / Deirdre Zamler vs Janis Jud / Jennifer Roberts6-1, 6-0
2025-02-21vs SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeirdre Zamler / Julie A Vucina vs Amy Harrington / Jill Valcarcel7-5, 6-4
2025-02-19vs SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Zamler / Laura Forlini vs Jill Valcarcel / Amy Harrington6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Deirdre Zamler
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.74
Laura Forlini
published
3.71
Jo Ann Magpusao
published
3.37
Diana Wheeler
published 3.5
3.15
Linda Scholink
published
Julie A Vucina
published
Kathy Moran
published
Priscilla Henry
published
Rosemary Favazza
published
Sally Wrye
published
Sandra Pepe
published
Sarah Sutton-Deakin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deirdre Zamler + Laura Forlini4172% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deirdre Zamler
88W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Laura Forlini
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Jo Ann Magpusao
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Diana Wheeler
22W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Linda Scholink
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.15
Julie A Vucina
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Moran
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Henry
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Favazza
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Wrye
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Pepe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Sutton-Deakin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.