Teams

Greenwich Racquet Club

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day

15 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesSarah Kaufman / Laura Huizi vs Meredith Weiss / Melanie Dritz6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKishori Scott / Maria Oliveira vs Betty Ng-Beckler / Elyssa Bortz6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEffie Strauss / Liane Tel vs Michelle Dinenberg / Arielle Rosenberg2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Finkel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ana Dean
published 2.5
Ashley Freiman
published 2.5
Effie Strauss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Irina Ferry
published
Kathleen Bembenek
published
Kerry Cox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kishori Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Huizi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Liane Tel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Oliveira
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Kumar
published
Sandra Kostel
published
Sarah Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yoon Choi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Finkel + Kerry Cox81043% games−0.7% vs expected
Abby Finkel + Samantha Kumar3748% games−1.1% vs expected
Kathleen Bembenek + Effie Strauss0730% games−13.8% vs expected
Ana Dean + Kerry Cox2350% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Kaufman + Laura Huizi134 matchesnot enough data
Ana Dean + Samantha Kumar213 matchesnot enough data
Ana Dean + Laura Huizi213 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Kumar + Kerry Cox213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Abby Finkel
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ana Dean
24W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Freiman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Effie Strauss
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Irina Ferry
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Bembenek
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerry Cox
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kishori Scott
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laura Huizi
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Liane Tel
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maria Oliveira
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Kumar
16W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Kostel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Kaufman
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yoon Choi
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.