← Teams

SJRC-Rice

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Nate Look
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.95
Kristie Leake
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Erica Drake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Rudd McGarity
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.46
Rich Rice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Stephanie Haas
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Troy Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Takumi Koyama
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-12-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTakumi Koyama / Rich Rice vs Cheryl Roloff / Greg Finnegan6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Haas / Troy Johnston vs Hideko Kershaw / William Wang6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristie Leake / Trenton Corvino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-11-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesTakumi Koyama / Kyle Newman vs JULIE ANDREWS / Alexander Calpagiu7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Haas / Rudd McGarity vs Shamarra Jackson / Minh Nguyen6-3, 7-5
2019-11-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRich Rice / Erica Drake vs James Hockley / Michaela Bancud6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNate Look / Nina Nguyen vs Rudy Martinez / Sally Sterling3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrenton Corvino / Stephanie Haas vs James Ringelberg / Nina Sanna6-3, 6-1
2019-11-03Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTrenton Corvino / Kristie Leake vs Kris Kelly-Koster / Tony Moreno6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Newman / Takumi Koyama vs Emily McBride / Tom Lonergan7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRich Rice / Erica Drake vs Patricia Sturr / Ken Crowley6-1, 6-1
2019-10-25Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRudd McGarity / Kristie Leake vs D'Arcy Martin / Marje Ferek6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Newman / Stephanie Haas vs Jono Neher / Amiee Moyers6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTroy Johnston / Nina Nguyen vs Bruce Yang / Misty Bettis7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2019-10-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRich Rice / Erica Drake vs Tammy Brennan / Timothy Johnson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRudd McGarity / Lisa Shantley vs Cassidy Brennan / Edward Whitney7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNate Look / Stephanie Haas vs Karen Pickering / Ramon Tuason6-2, 6-2
2019-10-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRich Rice / Erica Drake vs Toby Krauel / Paula Watt2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRudd McGarity / Nina Nguyen vs Sue Harrison / Kevin Heller6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTroy Johnston / Shella Razon-Lumetta vs Jason Moore-Greenke / Mary Lowblad7-6, 6-3
2019-09-22Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTrenton Corvino / Stephanie Haas vs Joe Warner / Suzanne DeLea1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristie Leake / Kyle Newman vs Zachary Kinavey / Amy Graham6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRudd McGarity / Nina Nguyen vs Sarah Lanigan / Meshi Chavez6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nate Look
61W–49L career
0%83%17%
3.97
4.5
Kristie Leake
126W–83L career · type A
26%74%0%
3.95
4
Erica Drake
45W–25L career
0%98%2%
3.86
4.5
Rudd McGarity
33W–65L career
73%27%0%
3.79
4
Rich Rice
65W–70L career
45%55%0%
3.46
3.5
Stephanie Haas
66W–82L career
0%98%2%
3.36
3.5
Troy Johnston
55W–40L career
not enough data
—
0
Takumi Koyama
47W–24L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.