Teams

SDNC LLW 3.5 KCP Rangers/ Warren

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles SDNC- WE · SDNC Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-26vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ PatwardhanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Satheesh Kandavelu vs Dana Gibson / Carlos Auyon6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-12vs SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ ChachisvilisWon 20
W#1 DoublesJason Hui / Edwin Ustariz vs Bruce Danielson / Randy James6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Satheesh Kandavelu vs Tim Miller / Phillip Schneider6-0, 6-3
2023-10-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesMark Warren / Edwin Ustariz vs John Park / Adam Thompson7-6, 6-4
2023-10-01vs SDNC 3.5 TC Vista/ MalluWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Trung Vu vs Luis Leung / Matt DeBeer6-0, 6-1
2023-09-17vs SDNC 3.5 Rancho Del Oro/ JaureguyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Jeffrey Felix vs Todd Walker / Keith Omsberg6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jason Hui
published
3.78
Davis Beasley
published 4
3.72
Matthew Brush
published
3.70
Trung Vu
published
3.46
Brad Bartlett
published 3.5
3.44
Mark Warren
published
3.41
Jeffrey Felix
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Edwin Ustariz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Satheesh Kandavelu
published
3.31
Michael Harlan
published
Robert Alpert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edwin Ustariz + Jeffrey Felix033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Hui
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Davis Beasley
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Matthew Brush
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Trung Vu
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Brad Bartlett
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Mark Warren
15W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Jeffrey Felix
114W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Edwin Ustariz
106W–96L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Satheesh Kandavelu
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Michael Harlan
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Robert Alpert
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.