Teams

Olig: Mustangs

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-03vs Northern/Brooks/18&Over3.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesNorman Abramson / Rob Leonard vs Zachary Johnson / Tristan Bradford6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJason Sheard vs Anthony Brooks0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhil Ecker / PETER SWANN vs Mark Bobnick / Nick Vogenthaler2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Ile / Jordan Gustafson vs Kurt New / Kevin Lee5-7, 2-6
2025-05-29vs Ramachandran/Follese--40LoveWon 32
L#1 DoublesJeff Lager / Glenn Galloway vs Andrew Capirchio / Chad Unger7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJason Sheard vs Richard Fogel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKendall Griffith / Norman Abramson vs Paul Hoffmann / Jung Bassett-kim6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJohn Tanner vs Harish Ramachandran4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Mueller / Cameron Olig vs David Samuels / LaMont Robinson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Rob Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Jason Sheard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Kendall Griffith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Cameron Olig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Phil Ecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Norman Abramson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Michael Ile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
John Tanner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Glenn Galloway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Jeff Lager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
PETER SWANN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Ecker + John Tanner3250% games+6.3% vs expected
Norman Abramson + Rob Leonard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rob Leonard
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Jason Sheard
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Kendall Griffith
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Cameron Olig
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Phil Ecker
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Norman Abramson
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Michael Ile
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
John Tanner
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Glenn Galloway
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
Jeff Lager
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jordan Gustafson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
PETER SWANN
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.