Teams

RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AW4.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-19vs SOUTH RENO TENNIS 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mann / Kerri Reed vs Cheryl Neff / Debra Ziegler1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-11vs CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesKerri Reed / Suzanne Hodnick vs Lisa Fore / Victoria Ness4-6, 3-6
2022-05-01vs CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesKerri Reed vs Dorthe Skov Johnston4-6, 1-6
2022-04-30vs CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 SinglesKerri Reed vs Amy Gunderson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-16vs SOUTH RENO TENNIS 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesKerri Reed vs Lesley Pittman6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lucretia Conklin
published
4.12
Adrian Shochat
published 4.5
4.00
Anne Inda
published 4
3.96
3.90
Becky Tam
published 4
3.89
Kerri Reed
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4
3.88
Trang Huynh
published
3.69
Jennifer Mann
published
3.67
Samantha Garlock
published
3.62
Becky Paulson
published 3.5
3.55
May Blom
published
3.53
Mahnoush Bagheri
published
3.36
Remy Bernarda
published
3.35
Shantica Dawkins
published
Chris Batory
published 3.5
3.18
Suzanne Hodnick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Inda + Christine Brenner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucretia Conklin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Adrian Shochat
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Anne Inda
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Christine Brenner
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Becky Tam
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Kerri Reed
159W–128L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Trang Huynh
24W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Jennifer Mann
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Samantha Garlock
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Becky Paulson
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.62
May Blom
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Mahnoush Bagheri
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
Remy Bernarda
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Shantica Dawkins
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Chris Batory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Hodnick
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.