← Teams

SHC-Blankenmeister/Mayer

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Paul Blankenmeister
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Jeff Welter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.08
Thomas MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Kerry Sweet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
William Place
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Larry Butrick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
John Slominski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 0
—
Scott Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-11-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPaul Blankenmeister / Scott Mayer vs Mark Benecke / Richard Tippets6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDave Backen / Jeff Welter vs Colin Looi / Steve Straub3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEli Lamb / William Place vs Ed de la Fuente / Mark Groves6-1, 7-6
2019-11-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDave Backen / Jeff Welter vs Darryl Walters / Ashok Nedungadi7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Blankenmeister / Thomas MacDonald vs Lew Woods / Stan Smith6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKerry Sweet / John Slominski vs Keibun Hayashi / Feng-Yu Liu6-1, 6-4
2019-11-02Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLarry Butrick / David Manfield vs Rich Brown / Ian Rogers6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeff Welter / James Zupancic vs Robert Grenzer / John Lynch6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEli Lamb / William Place vs Brad Mathewson / Thomas Harvey6-4, 6-0
2019-10-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJeff Welter / Dave Backen vs Rex Smith / James Richardson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / David Manfield vs Lew Woods / Ashok Nedungadi6-1, 6-2
2019-10-26Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / David Manfield vs Rich Brown / John Lynch6-2, 7-6
2019-10-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesScott Mayer / William Place vs Mark Benecke / Richard Tippets6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Slominski / Coleman Cobb vs Steve Straub / Richard Eaton7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry Butrick / Scott Mandel vs Jack Crossen / John Bala7-5, 6-0
2019-10-04Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Thomas MacDonald vs Keith Westrum / Douglas Bennett3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Manfield / Scott Mandel vs Masafumi Inoue / Frank Brown6-0, 6-3
2019-09-08Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / Jeff Welter vs Wes Milligan / Douglas Bennett2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Mandel / David Manfield vs Arkadiy Boyarshinov / Dennis Kviz6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paul Blankenmeister
33W–21L career · type S
7%92%0%
3.17
3.5
Jeff Welter
77W–46L career
11%89%0%
3.13
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09
3
Thomas MacDonald
54W–33L career
0%59%41%
3.08
3
Kerry Sweet
31W–63L career
5%95%0%
2.65
3
William Place
31W–50L career
14%86%0%
2.61
3
Larry Butrick
47W–55L career
37%63%0%
2.50
0
John Slominski
16W–37L career
not enough data
—
0
Scott Mandel
21W–17L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.