Teams

Cefalu/18/4.5/MD/LEG

2026 BR Mixed 18 & Over · 4.5 BR (18&O) Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-23vs Simpson/18/4.5/MD/BOCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Ann Hill / Christopher Russo vs Laura Wilson / David McGraw6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadison Cefalu / Ryan Burch vs Tracy Simpson / Moe Hattier7-5, 6-2
2026-06-22vs Simpson/18/4.5/MD/BOCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMadison Cefalu / Ryan Burch vs Lucille Bourgeois / John Scalise6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCamille Fremaux / Kristopher Liptak vs Tracy Simpson / Jose Len6-1, 6-1
2026-06-09vs Simpson/18/4.5/MD/BOCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMadison Cefalu / Christopher Russo vs Tracy Simpson / David McGraw6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMalini Bueche / Joseph Rizzo vs Lucille Bourgeois / Moe Hattier6-4, 6-3
2026-06-04vs Simpson/18/4.5/MD/BOCWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Russo / Kelly Ann Hill vs David McGraw / Lucille Bourgeois6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLucas Richardson / Cameron Raines vs Moe Hattier / Tracy Simpson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMalini Bueche / Joseph Rizzo vs Laura Wilson / John Scalise6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 BR (18&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cefalu/18/4.5/MD/LEG40120032
2Simpson/18/4.5/MD/BOC0401224145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lucas Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Christopher Russo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cameron Raines
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Camille Fremaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Joseph Rizzo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kelly Ann Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristopher Liptak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Cefalu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Malini Bueche
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan Burch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucas Richardson
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Christopher Russo
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Cameron Raines
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Camille Fremaux
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joseph Rizzo
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.03
Kelly Ann Hill
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristopher Liptak
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Madison Cefalu
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Malini Bueche
22W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Burch
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.