Teams

Raintree- Martin

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-14vs Kanawha-PageLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Shannon Webb vs Kristen Moslow / Kindra Kirkeby5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-13vs ACAC- CallaghanLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Martinique Kandl4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-05vs Salisbury- AndrewsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Morris / Shannon Webb vs Heather Benedetti / Annmarie Strachan6-4, 6-3
2024-05-31vs Woodlake CookseyWon 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Martin / Shannon Webb vs Laura Kelly / Karen ODonnell7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Lisa Harmon
published
3.30
Lorraine McGehee
published
3.25
Suzanne Martin
published
3.24
Mandy Setliff
published
3.23
Corrine Cooper
published 3.5
3.22
Bridget Westhoven
published 3.5
3.10
Shannon Webb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.02
Donna Moody
published 3.5
3.00
Christine Martine
published 3.5
Anne Sansom
published 3
Karen Wood
published
Kathryn Darling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Harmon + Lorraine McGehee404 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Webb + Suzanne Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Harmon
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
Lorraine McGehee
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Suzanne Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Mandy Setliff
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Corrine Cooper
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Bridget Westhoven
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Donna Moody
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Anne Sansom
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Wood
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Darling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.