Teams

BH - Good Gets

2021 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesLindy Kastendike vs Alice Raucher6-1, 6-3
2021-06-03vs ACACWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Candice van der Linde6-1, 6-2
2021-05-23vs GlenmoreSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Carol Haig7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherry Lake / Lindy Kastendike vs Rebecca Bushey / Andrea Richardson3-6, 3-6
2021-05-16vs ACACSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Candice van der Linde3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatasha Heller / Lindy Kastendike vs Charlotte Odom / Elizabeth Glover6-4, 6-1
2021-05-08vs GlenmoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesNatasha Heller / Lindy Kastendike vs Tamara Freeman / Rebecca Bushey6-4, 6-4
2021-05-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Alice Raucher7-5, 6-2
2021-04-25vs BHS - Dropshot DivasWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Pietro / Anita McGinty vs Karen Overman / Lynne Spewak6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Sherry Lake vs Jennifer Ludovici / Alice Raucher6-2, 6-2
2021-04-11vs ACACWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Gretchen Masselli vs Jana Campbell-Goetz / Elizabeth Glover6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
2.95
Lindy Kastendike
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.92
Natasha Heller
published
2.90
2.24
Sherry Lake
published
Laura Pietro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita McGinty + Lindy Kastendike303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 11 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Lindy Kastendike
73W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
2.95
Natasha Heller
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sherry Lake
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.24
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.