Teams

GTC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs DTC REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesCameran Jewell vs Robyn Tolva6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTi Mougne / Susan Bruce vs Elisabeth Vezzani / Evelyn Price1-6, 2-6
2023-07-17vs CM GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Dahl / Ti Mougne vs Kendall Carbone / Anne Doubet6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCameran Jewell / Alison Mueller vs Polly Warner / Anne McWilliams6-1, 6-3
2023-07-05vs WP REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Mueller / Cameran Jewell vs Tamara Whelpley / Bonnie King6-0, 6-1
2023-06-26vs GPTC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Schneck / Ti Mougne vs Shannon Brooks / Renee Morris7-6, 6-4
2023-06-20vs CP REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesDanielle Dahl / Ti Mougne vs Cyndie Miller / AMY SITZE6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Danielle Dahl
published 3.5
3.21
Alison Mueller
published 3.5
3.19
Ti Mougne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Katherine Brownson
published
2.89
Cameran Jewell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Rachel Brand
published
2.34
Jennifer Stack
published
Katie Schneck
published
Sabine Hoover
published
Susan Bruce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ti Mougne + Danielle Dahl404 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Brand + Sabine Hoover303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Dahl
33W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Alison Mueller
23W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Ti Mougne
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Katherine Brownson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Cameran Jewell
55W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.89
Rachel Brand
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.63
Jennifer Stack
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
Katie Schneck
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sabine Hoover
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Bruce
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.