Teams

Patrick/18's/3.5W/Mac

2025 Monroe Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Monroe (18&O) Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-21vs Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/ForLost 05
L#1 DoublesSherry Hamilton / Kathy Patrick vs Kimberly Leija / Natalie Leija4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaula Hoer vs Laura Blackwell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMilly McIntyre / Marsha Cobb vs Wesley Johnson / Helen Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDeborah Giger vs Anna Shaw2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Hilburn / Julie Johnson vs Dani Manning / Misti Hajj3-6, 4-6
2025-04-20vs Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/ForLost 05
L#1 DoublesKathy Patrick / Brenda Hilburn vs Kimberly Leija / Natalie Leija4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Giger vs Anna Shaw2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMilly McIntyre / Marsha Cobb vs Helen Johnson / Wesley Johnson3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPaula Hoer vs Holly Coons3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDianne Graham / Sherry Hamilton vs Mary K Gilley / Dani Manning5-7, 4-6
2025-04-16vs Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/ForLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrenda Hilburn / Kathy Patrick vs Diana Breen / Misti Hajj3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Giger vs Holly Coons7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDianne Graham / Marsha Cobb vs Mary K Gilley / Dani Manning4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPaula Hoer vs Anna Shaw2-6, 2-6
2025-04-15vs Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/ForLost 03
L#1 SinglesDeborah Giger vs Holly Coons4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Patrick / Brenda Hilburn vs Diana Breen / Misti Hajj3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPaula Hoer vs Anna Shaw3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Monroe (18&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/For402001124
2Patrick/18's/3.5W/Mac0402040241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Dianne Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Brenda Hilburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Marsha Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Milly McIntyre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Kathy Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Deborah Giger
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Paula Hoer
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Cobb + Dianne Graham044 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Patrick + Brenda Hilburn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dianne Graham
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brenda Hilburn
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Cobb
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.23
Milly McIntyre
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Kathy Patrick
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Deborah Giger
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Hoer
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.