Teams

Baker/Bright/Nashville

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - Saturday Daytime

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNell Adams / Mary Stone vs Stephanie Dunkle / Joan Mensinger4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Ashford / Kimberly Baker vs Susan Mattson / Jane Ringel6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Baker / Lisa Beasley vs Marian Leary / Mary Agee0-6, 2-6
2026-07-02vs Jones/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Stone / Lee Oakley vs Julie Carpenter / Sally Goodrich3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNell Adams / Mary Barton vs Cynthia Weatherly / Pat Yung-Okamoto6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlenda Anderson / Allison Braswell vs Betty Tudor / Cheryl Byrd2-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Braswell / Lee Oakley vs Marian Leary / Mary Agee3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKim Bright / Kimberly Baker vs Stephanie Dunkle / Joan Mensinger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Baker / Mary Barton vs Jane Ringel / Susan Mattson5-7, 4-6
2026-06-13vs Jones/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Ashford / Glenda Anderson vs Constance Baker / Susan Feazel0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Baker / Peggy Rosenblatt vs Cheryl Byrd / Susan Furman1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNell Adams / Mary Candice Burger vs Jamie Tilley / Julie Carpenter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-06vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Baker / Mary Candice Burger vs Marian Leary / Mary Agee6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNell Adams / Mary Barton vs Susan Mattson / Kimberly Brown4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Bright / Lisa Beasley vs Veronica Pulley / Beth Molteni6-7, 3-6
2026-05-16vs Jones/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Baker / Mary Candice Burger vs Constance Baker / Nita Hollis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Barton / Kim Bright vs Jamie Tilley / Betty Tudor4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Baker / Nell Adams vs Cheryl Byrd / Susan Feazel1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Women - Saturday Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Baker/Bright/Nashville1531532201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adelaide Geer
published 3.5
3.10
Mary Barton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Mary Candice Burger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Lee Oakley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Kim Bright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Lisa Beasley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Nell Adams
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Linda Ashford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Peggy Rosenblatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Wendy Baker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Glenda Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Rosenblatt + Nell Adams2350% gamesnot enough data
Mary Barton + Nell Adams314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bright + Wendy Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adelaide Geer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Barton
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Mary Candice Burger
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lee Oakley
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Kim Bright
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Lisa Beasley
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.91
Nell Adams
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Linda Ashford
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Peggy Rosenblatt
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Wendy Baker
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Glenda Anderson
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.