Teams

2022 Womens 40 & Over 3.5- Club Nau Ponce-Marg

Adult 40 & Over 2022 · Adult Women 40&Over 3.5-Flight 3

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#3 DoublesMaritza Duran / Margaret Lopez vs Diana Lugo / Judith Rodriguez6-2, 6-4
L#4 DoublesIleana Nigaglioni / Mayra Lopez vs Edna Martinez / Lee Rios4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelby Febus / Ileana Nigaglioni vs Georgette Rodriguez / Lorena Ocasio3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIleana Nigaglioni vs Myritza Castillo1-6, 0-4
L#3 DoublesYadyra Manfredy / Margaret Lopez vs Georgette Rodriguez / Lorena Ocasio2-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesMaria Pacheco-Godoy / Margaret Lopez vs Marie Rodriguez / Brunimarie Gonzalez0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Vivas-Gonzalez / Margaret Lopez vs Marisol Ramos / Erohani Torres7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMayra Lopez / Ileana Nigaglioni vs Irene Justiniano / Maria Ramirez1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMelby Febus / Ileana Nigaglioni vs Kathy Brayfield / Arelis Mena3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMayra Lopez / Margaret Lopez vs Elaine Rivera / Edna Martinez5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 40&Over 3.5-Flight 3 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Ivette Martinez
published 3.5
Ana Castro
published 3.5
3.23
Melby Febus
published
3.13
Diana Droz
published 3.5
2.96
Maritza Duran
published
2.80
Margaret Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Ileana Nigaglioni
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Maria Pacheco-Godoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Lopez + Ana Castro5159% games+0.1% vs expected
Rebecca Sicari Zaragoza + Ana Castro224 matchesnot enough data
Diana Droz + Melby Febus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ivette Martinez
29W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Ana Castro
19W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melby Febus
65W–25L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Diana Droz
22W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Maritza Duran
26W–36L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Margaret Lopez
33W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ileana Nigaglioni
22W–48L career · 10 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Maria Pacheco-Godoy
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Sicari Zaragoza
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.