Teams

Woodford

2025 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-19vs Northern/Thies/65&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarsha Fosburgh / Debra Tresidder vs Jacqueline Kirk / Kathy Lomen6-3
L#2 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Maureen Wollak vs Linda Morgan / Patricia Rhodus0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Maki / Joan Woodford vs Joan Gustafson / Carol Thies3-6
2025-08-19vs Northern/Thies/65&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarsha Fosburgh / Debra Tresidder vs Joan Gustafson / Patricia Rhodus3-6
L#2 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Maureen Wollak vs Patricia Baughman / Kathy Lomen3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Maki / Joan Woodford vs Cindy Harriage / Anita Pfiefer6-4
2025-08-19vs Northern/Thies/65&Over7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarsha Fosburgh / Debra Tresidder vs Patricia Baughman / Michele Weddle6-1
W#2 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Maureen Wollak vs Diane Drake / Linda Morgan6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Maki / Joan Woodford vs Patricia Rhodus / Carol Thies1-6
2025-08-19vs Northern/Thies/65&Over7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarsha Fosburgh / Debra Tresidder vs Cindy Harriage / Jacqueline Kirk6-3
W#2 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Maureen Wollak vs Patricia Baughman / Anita Pfiefer6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Maki / Joan Woodford vs Diane Drake / Michele Weddle3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Marsha Fosburgh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Debra Tresidder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
2.92
Maureen Wollak
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
2.73
Laura Maki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.63
Bernadette MacKey
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Joan Woodford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Maki + Maureen Wollak6260% games+2.5% vs expected
Bernadette MacKey + Maureen Wollak7945% games−10.2% vs expected
Laura Maki + Joan Woodford1539% gamesnot enough data
Marsha Fosburgh + Debra Tresidder314 matchesnot enough data
Bernadette MacKey + Laura Maki044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marsha Fosburgh
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Debra Tresidder
6W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Maureen Wollak
29W–24L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Laura Maki
15W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Bernadette MacKey
13W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Joan Woodford
3W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.